The Sony OLED A90J series offers slightly better picture quality, but it's also significantly more expensive. The C1 comes with perfect black levels and screen uniformity with off-angle viewing similar to what plasma TVs can offer. The easy answer to the question that we kicked off with? Get the LG OLED C2 in whichever screen size you prefer. Sony OLED TVs offer slightly better performance, but the minute picture quality improvements may not be worth the extra cost for most people. One more thing - OLED TVs offer better picture quality than even the best plasma TVs ever sold, all while consuming a fraction of the power. Check out the TV market today: 3D TVs are long gone, nearly all TVs sold today are the 4K/UHD variety, and 55-65 inch OLED TVs can be found at reasonable prices and will last more than just a few years. As well, the cost of scaling 2011-era OLED technology to typical consumer TV display sizes would have made that Sharp Elite TV look like a great deal in comparison. OLED TVs were displayed occasionally at annual technology shows while they looked great, not a single manufacturer had found a solution to the comically short lifespan that plagued prototype panels. 3D TVs (remember those?) never garnered much enthusiasm, and 4K was an expensive novelty at best. Nostalgia aside, it's important to look back at this particular era of TV technology development to frame our present-day problem with the correct perspective. For videophiles and cinema enthusiasts, the plasma TV represented the only viable option. More down-to-earth LED LCD TVs provided "good enough" picture quality, but came with flaws such as backlight unevenness, poor motion handling, unimpressive black levels, and "blooming" when rendering darker scenes with high-contrast images. The only LED LCD TV that provided a legitimate challenge in terms of performance compared to a typical plasma TV was the absurdly expensive - and difficult to find - Sharp Elite PRO-60X5FD/PRO-70X5FD series that channeled the legendary Pioneer Kuro Elite plasma TVs of the late 2000s. If you were lucky enough to purchase one of the last Panasonic Viera plasma TVs sold in this country, you may remember a different TV landscape that existed in 2013. Despite their inherently superior picture quality and surprisingly affordable prices, dwindling consumer interest and falling prices of rival HDTV technologies led to the plasma display panel joining CRTs and DLP/rear projection in the "obsolete" section of the consumer TV market. LG and Samsung sold their last PDP sets in 2015 (largely as re-hashed versions of their respective 2014 models), while Panasonic packed up their plasma TV operations in 2014 and left the US TV market entirely only a couple years later. A 1080i source was running, and I could detect the disadvantage of the lower resolution, it wasn't particularly terrible though.Try searching for the best plasma TVs today, and you may have found out the hard way that plasma TVs no longer exist. Would I be able to take full advantage of my Xbox 360 if I hooked it up to the LG? Like I've stated earlier, the colours and black levels were good. As far as I can tell only older plasmas used this resolution. Specwise however, the tv is certainly an oddball, it had two hdmi inputs and one component (pretty okay, just about everything I need) but the resolution however has me slightly scared: 852 X 480. The price was also very appealing: 499 euros. It's picture bettered all the lcd's that stood around it, it's black levels were far deeper. One that looked particularly interesting was the 32PC51, a new plasma tv by LG. My budget isn't very high, being a student and all but I managed to find some decent tv's. I browsed a store yesterday, and there were models that looked interesting. I currently use a 21 inch Philips SDTV and as a result, all my Xbox games look like utter rubbish. I'm in the market for a new tv, something smallish for my bedroom.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |